beyond vietnam rhetorical analysis beyond vietnam rhetorical analysis

However, he is about to arm them with many valid reasons why it is crucial for them to join the opposition. In his argument, King mounts a multi-pronged attack on America's participation in the Vietnam war and also gains people's sympathy for the Vietnamese. Moreover, Martin Luther King Jr meticulously chooses specific words that carry with them a negative connotation that helps associate the Vietnamese war with injustice. First of all, King makes his point clear by appealing to the reader's common sense, beliefs and values (logos). It also describes the Jim Crow laws and the busboy cot from 1955. The speech was given to a large, mixed audience of primarily civil rights activists. In a sense, he dives right into the idea that it is unrealistic for them to find freedom in a region halfway across the world when they couldnt even find it in America. King's criticism of the war as "broken and eviscerated," allows him to establish a disappointed tone that conveys the idea that the war is immoral and by doing so his precise word choice lets him to attack it as such. For example, he says that if Americas soul becomes totally poisoned, part of the autopsy must read: Vietnam. King uses this metaphor to establish the potentially dreadful consequences of America continuing to fight the war. He mentions that the war has led to the increase of violence in . Overall, the effective use of various rhetorical strategies is what makes the speech so valuable. Luthers speech was a passionate rhetoric that preached his views about the future. During this time period there was a lot of controversy surrounding the war. Dr. Kings purpose is to make the church leaders he is speaking to aware that the time has come for them to speak out loudly in opposition of the war in Vietnam. King wants his audience. Then Dr. King says that the church should oppose the war simply because it is counter to the ministry of Jesus Christ. The speaker comments, that they wander into the hospitals with at least twenty casualties from American firepower for one Vietcong-inflicted injury. King uses quotes as these to suggest to convince them of the destruction of the Vietnam War, with pathos, by strongly appealing to his audience's emotion. Here, Martin Luther King Jr is getting the audience emotionally and completely invested by showing the effect of America in Vietnam on their lives. If you are the original creator of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. He also focuses on the maltreatment of humanity, and how the Vietnam War is a start to the violence that occurs in America. No one should be restricted from rights and opportunities that others are given for that long. King uses personal anecdotes, elaborate word choice, and reliable facts to persuade his audience of the injustice of the war. For these practical and logical reasons, the church should join the opposition. On April 4, 1967 Martin Luther King Jr. wrote a speech named, Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence addressing the Vietnam War. He expresses his anguish at seeing people of Vietnam and America suffer and also notes that if American folks do not break their silence they stand to lose much more than their opponents. In his speech, Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence Martin Luther King Jr., uses appeals to emotion, appeals to credibility, and powerful diction to strengthen his argument and persuade his audience that the Vietnam War is unjust. The speech deemed racial segregation to be an inhumane practice that subdivides society into groups that essentially alienate them from the true sense of humanity; which is brotherhood. The war lasted from 1955 to 1975.The nation as a whole began to uproar over the war and the major consequences of the war. Rhetorical Mlk Speech "Beyond Vietnam". match. Martin Luther King Jr. applies imagery throughout his speech in order to illustrate the horrors of the war to arouse anger at its atrocities and injustice. Dream like you will live forever, live like you will die today. This quote is referencing how poor and rich people were drafted to war but the poor people had no one left to support the family. The audience felt empowered by the sentence alone. "The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis." While his I Have a Dream speech is considered his best one, his other speeches too offer a glimpse of his powerful rhetoric and his art of persuasion. Instead, King chooses to use facts to show what an illness war is. However, his words while they aim to bring the pain of the Vietnamese alive before the audience also include a request that a progressive nation should stand with humanity and not lose control of its feelings. Through his use of imagery, diction, and parallel structure, Martin Luther King Jr associates the war in Vietnam with injustice in his famous speech, "Beyond Vietnam - A Time to Break Silence.". Read a rhetorical analysis of Martin Luther King Jr's Beyond Vietnam: Time to break silence. Also, if you have a comment about a particular piece of work on this website, please go to the page where that work is displayed and post a comment on it. Is Hydrogen Fuel Efficient Enough to Replace Fossil Fuels in the Near Future. Go back to Mississippi, go back to Alabama, go back to South Carolina, go back to Georgia, go back to Louisiana, go back to the slums and ghettos of our northern cities, knowing that somehow this situation can and will be changed. This essay was written by a fellow student. StudyCorgi. When he argues that the wars immoral nature should be incandescently clear, he implies to his audience that those who do not voice their opinion against the war are not concerned for, the integrity and life of America. Finally, Martin Luther King Jr. uses parallelism within his own reflection to evoke emotions in his audience to show that . Likewise, the image of men, both black and while, in brutal solidarity burning the huts of a poor village, helps establish the war in Vietnam as a complete disaster and atrocity. He specifically mentions a poverty program that was looking promising before the United States became involved in Vietnam. By claiming that the United States, "the greatest purveyor of violence," prefers, "massive doses of violence to solve its problems," King effectively establishes the U.S. government as the pervasive wrongdoer. The irony is explicit in Kings words that the war is just an attempt to cover and hide the more pressing issues before America. However, the persuasiveness of his speeches does not come solely from his ability to connect with his audience's emotions but from an extraordinary ability to reason and validate his point. This paper was written and submitted to our database by a student to assist your with your own studies. "The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis." Dr. King's purpose is . (21). Overall, Martin Luther King Jr. eloquently argues against the United States involvement in Vietnam through his use of parallelism, diction, and imagery. Along with, and the almost facile connection between the war in Vietnam, First, Martin Luther King Jr. uses emotional appeals to persuade his audience that the Vietnam War is unjust because it is unfairly killing the poor and its destroying the country. On April 4, 1967, King addressed a crowd of 3,000 in Riverside Church by delivering a speech titled, "Beyond Vietnam," in the midst of the cruelty of the Vietnam War. Acting almost as a climax, King lyrically urges his audience to voice their opinions and wage a war against this unjustified war in Vietnam. Recognizing that citizens in poverty were not able to support their families while away from home at war, Martin Luther King included that war [and being enlisted in battle was] an enemy of poor to demonstrate how even though any man could be drafted, the economically stable left behind support for their family while the impoverished were ineligible of doing so (Source A). Despite criticism from speaking out about things other than civil rights, King uses syntax, rhetorical strategies, and appeals to . submit it as your own as it will be considered plagiarism. By claiming that the United States, "the greatest purveyor of violence," prefers, "massive doses of violence to solve its problems," King effectively establishes the U.S. government as the pervasive wrongdoer. All of the valid arguments and vivid imagery Dr. King uses combine to make this a very effective, passionate and memorable speech. Registration number: 419361 He spoke at Riverside Church in New York City, a venue that had a history of hosting progressive speakers and thinkers. Thank you for sharing this page with a friend! The most famous speeches in the United States history all have utilized rhetoric devices and strategies. In multiple paragraphs of his speech, King effectively appeals to emotion by using personal anecdotes that involve him speaking to people of poverty directly. Rhetorical Analysis of MLK's Speech "Beyond Vietnam". The fact that young black men are being sent [across the world] to fight for the liberties in Southeast Asia, which they [have] not found in Georgia and East Harlem questions the validity of Americas founding principles of the unalienable rights of every individual; life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. He offers many practical reasons for the opposition, as well as spiritual and moral reasons. Luther starts off by explaining that Vietnam heavily takes away valuable money of the US. Martin Luther King, Jr in his speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence argued that US foreign policy was hypocritical when compared to the inequality present in the United States. Because of his crowd of mix races King made sure to make his speech imploring to all no matter what the race that they may be. King Jr makes a strong statement against war and his speech successfully evokes compassion and sympathy for the poor and the weak in both Vietnam and America. Martin Luther King (MLK) was an activist and a minister who claimed that the war on Vietnam was wrong. Martin Luther King Jr. applies imagery throughout his speech in order to illustrate the horrors of the war to arouse anger at its atrocities and injustice. It is just a continuation of the regimes that have been trying to oppress the Vietnamese. Here, at ACaseStudy.com, we deliver professionally written papers, and the best grades for you from your professors are guaranteed! The idea of nonviolence is much larger than ordinary people see. It is not typical for churches to do so. King Jr delivered his "Beyond Vietnam -- A Time to Break Silence" in 1967 in NewYork City. Comparing the Justice System during the 1960s to a corrupt bank allows the audience to connect to what Dr. King is saying. At Introduction Martin Luther King, Jr in his speech "Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence" argued that US foreign policy was hypocritical when compared to the inequality present in the United States. In his speech on the meaninglessness of the Vietnam war and to persuade the audience to listen to its own conscience rather than to conform to the idea of war in the name of patriotism, King Jr draws from the realms of economy, society, polity as well as religion and philosophy. He repeatedly stresses upon breaking the silence because in this situation being silent was a sin. King uses personal anecdotes, elaborate word choice, and reliable facts to persuade his audience of the injustice of the war. He wants them to go back to their churches and spread the message. Please note that while we value your input, we cannot respond to every message. We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. In this way, he condemns and questions the Vietnam war and its relevance at a time when America had several of its own major problems to address. King draws sympathy for his cause from the reader who sees the unjustness of the situation he and his followers are dealing with. Martin Luther King Jr., Malcom X, and Stokely Carmichael all had quite famous speeches that took a stance on racial inequality. His first reasons are all about practicality. Moreover, it is the poor and the helpless mainly who are falling prey to this war game. The line, "For the sake of those boys, for the sake of this government, for the sake of the hundreds of thousands trembling under our violence, I cannot be silent," demonstrates how King uses parallelism. Favorite Quote:Life is like a box of cheese and flower petal sometimes it's soft and sweet, sometimes it just plain stinks. Rhetorical Analysis In King's Beyond Vietnam. We try to make TeenInk.com the best site it can be, and we take your feedback very seriously. King was really able to speak to his audience by using evidence, reasoning, and a persuasive writing style throughout his speech. 838 Words In case you can't find a relevant example, our professional writers are ready 1) Controversial Opinions of MLK 2) Religious figure talking about political problems 3) Malcolm X and his ideas Fitting Response EXIGENCY First Persona-Martin Luther King Second Persona-American Population and the Civil Rights Movement Third Persona- Vietnamese Population King spoke for the weak that did not have the voices to speak for themselves; for example, he represented the poor. Showing his knowledge of the history of the war and using it to discredit the United States reason for being there is crucial to Dr. King in developing his position. Since an autopsy is only done on dead creatures, King is saying that eventually, the soul of America might die. The imagery paints a dark picture in the audiences mind. Rodriguez 1 Melanie Rodriguez Ms. Jimenez Composition II 20 October, 2017 A Rhetorical Analysis of Martin Luther King Jr.'s "Beyond Vietnam" "Never be afraid to do what's right. Furthermore, when these stylistic elements are concluded with his use of parallelism, King effectively establishes America's involvement in the Vietnam War as unjust. Furthermore, such a vivid picture will linger permanently in the audiences mind, which will make them think about the terrible outcome in the future. He calls the situation some idle political plaything of a society gone mad on war. writing your own paper, but remember to Overall, Martin Luther King Jr. eloquently argues against the United States involvement in Vietnam through his use of parallelism, diction, and imagery. He is using vivid language to describe the casualties; however, they are also supported by evidence, as he is using precise numbers in this part of the speech. Additionally, when King claims that all this horror is in the name of America, he appeals to his audiences anger, leading them to believe that it is time for them to break silence on the fact that the United States became involved in an unjust war in Vietnam. King's criticism of the war as "broken and eviscerated," allows him to establish a disappointed tone that conveys the idea that the war is immoral and by doing so his precise word choice lets him to attack it as such. "Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence" Rhetorical Analysis Introduction In this paper the speech "Beyond Vietnam" of Martin Luther king will be analyzed through the framework of Neo-Aristotelian criticism. Rhetorical Devices In Beyond Vietnam Speech 736 Words3 Pages All they wanted was "to save the soul of America" (King, Beyond, 42). He believed that the Vietnam War diverted money and attention from domestic programs created to aid the black poor and would benefit only the banks who fund wars and the industries that supply the war. How about receiving a customized one? Despite having a shining moment of experiments, hopes, [and] new beginnings during the struggle for human rights, King illustrates the Vietnam War as broken and eviscerate and a political plaything of a society gone mad on war. On April 4, 1967 at Riverside Church in New York, MLK delivered "Beyond Vietnam" , which created a different perspective on the Vietnam war, in which is a negative thing. The paper also analyzes Martin Luther Kings speech I have a dream with the purpose of rhetorical devices and how well they have been used in the speech, and how Afro-Americans conditions have been at the time. Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam: A Time To Break Silence, During the 20th century, the Vietnam War had a profound impact on Americans, but there was a side of the story that was less known- voices from the poor. It is a dream deeply rooted in the American dream. (King). Hence, Kings works always had the recurring theme of the unity and strength of combined willpower. Registered address: Louki Akrita, 23 Bellapais Court, Flat/Office 46 1100, Nicosia, Cyprus The rhetoric helps prove how the poor lived worse in the, King, a supporter of President Lyndon B. Johnson and his Great Society, became concerned about U.S. involvement in Vietnam. Moreover, this set of diction allows King to logically state that he can not continue to fight on behalf of the oppressed if he himself doesnt address their oppressor, the U.S. government. The Braveheart speech, while famous for being powerful, is very different from another powerful speech, the one from Dead Poets Society. The audience now feel as though this is very important because it has to do with regular poor people and t effects them as well. Finally, Martin Luther King Jr. uses parallelism within his own reflection to evoke emotions in his audience to show that . Through utilising figurative language to juxtapose optimistic progress and demonic destruction, King is able to emphasise how devastating the Vietnam War is. However, a very powerful speech, in manys opinion, is the Ive Been to the Mountaintop speech, given shortly before Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was assassinated. Another rhetorical device is the common ground he establishes in his last sentence where he writes, "This is the story of Why We Can't Wait" (King 98-99). They wander into the towns and see thousands of the children, homeless, without clothes, running in packs on the streets like animals (20). His use of imagery and diction is aimed at making people break their silence and express their anger clearly. Throughout the first paragraph of Kings speech, he used emotional diction with words such as struggle, poverty, and poor to prove that the war in Vietnam was bringing down the Americans and their families fighting overseas. Dr. King says that the war is draining valuable resources that could be helping the poor in our own country. In conclusion, Martin Luther King Jr.'s "Beyond Vietnam" speech was a powerful and eloquent call for peace and justice. In order to convince his audience that the civil rights movement in the United States should oppose the Vietnam War, the speaker appealed to their ethos, pathos, and logos. More importantly, King states that, the poor has been manipulated into believing a type of reality that simply isnt accurate or fair on their part. StudyCorgi. King is effectively able to convey his point about his topic by using rhetorical devices such as logos, ethos, pathos. He states, Many people have questioned me about the wisdom of my path. A Time to do What is Right. Ethos, the appeal to the legitimacy and authority of the speaker, is used throughout the speech. His choice of diction and use of imagery help him deliver his point effectively in a manner that impresses both the audience's heart and mind. Through his use of imagery, diction, and parallel structure, Martin Luther King Jr associates the war in Vietnam with injustice in his famous speech, "Beyond Vietnam - A Time to Break. Furthermore, when these stylistic elements are concluded with his use of parallelism, King effectively establishes America's involvement in the Vietnam War as unjust. His speech grows deeply sarcastic at times. Dr. King says, Even when pressed by the demands of inner truth, men do not easily assume the task of opposing their governments policy, especially in time of war (3). Pathos is a method applied to represent an appeal to feelings and emotions in a speech and other various kinds of writing. Later in his speech, King writes again using an advanced vocabulary to reinforce his academic background with, America would never be free or saved from itself until the descendants of its slaves were loosed completely from the shackles they still wear. By using the word shackles, the reader can easily create a vivid image in their mind of how restricted the poor must feel, and whether it be physically or mentally, they can understand how much the restrained are longing for a sense of freedom. He says, And we must rejoice as well, for surely this is the first time in our nation's history that a significant number of its religious leaders have chosen to move beyond the prophesying of smooth patriotism to the high grounds of a firm dissent based upon the mandates of conscience and the reading of history.